The answer to this question is tactically dependent. Enemy capability must be a prime consideration in making this decision. In other instances where the bridge is large, dropping a single span may prevent enemy use, conserve demolitions, and make the bridge easier to reconstruct at a later date. In some instances where the span is short or the bridge has no intermediate supports, destruction of the entire bridge may be required. ![]() Only that portion of the bridge essential to accomplish the military objective should be destroyed. There are several very important factors that must be considered and planned such as: The vulnerability of the enemy is greatly increased during river crossings and presents a good opportunity to destroy his forces.īridge destruction cannot be accomplished haphazardly. A river crossing operation is one of the most difficult operations to perform successfully as it normally requires extensive time and resources.īy demolishing or rendering existing bridges unserviceable, we can force the enemy to use time and resources to conduct tactical river crossings. ![]() Without existing bridges, forces must conduct river crossings using tactical bridging. The use of existing bridges is critical to the mobility of a military force. Generally, roads and railroads also follow what would be likely military avenues of approach. In most developed countries of the world, bridges have been constructed to span these waterways along lines of communication. Streams and rivers are formidable obstacles to mobility. ![]() Employing all types of obstacles will provide flexibility to the commander and increase the variety of obstacles that the enemy must encounter. This chapter describes the employment and execution of countermobility activities other than minefields. There are many countermobility assets and methods at the commander's disposal. Chapter 6 OBSTACLES OTHER THAN MINEFIELDS
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |